No they wont. you can quote any internet article you want. I site real world experience.
Having looked specifically for examples of it, it's all I see now...plenty of threads on N54Tech, Facebook N54 pages and a handful of YouTube videos.
That's why with me I'd rather buy I higher mileage single owner car then lower mileage multiple. Especially cause usually if car has seen alot of owners it may be a lemon and if you ask everyone will just blame previous owners for any issuesI also see a lot of people bragging about their $4,500 cars which they are beating the ever-living out of. Maintenance matters more than anything. And that includes, the awareness of having an issue and needing maintenance.
A friend recently bought an inexpensive E90 (twice the above price, though) with over 100k miles. Lots of maintenance. When I took a few things apart, plenty of oil and dirt in the engine compartment, lots of missing hardware (like holding down the cowl assembly), JB Weld holding together the upper radiator snout, extra parts in the top shock tower perch, et cetera. And it had maintenance records. When a car gets to be 10+ years old, and has performance, it can often have 3-4 owners. One becomes an automotive archeologist. For whatever maintenance it may have, lots of hands have often touched it by 100+k. Of course there are cream puffs, but nonetheless I think my experience with this particular E90 is hardly uncommon.
Filippo
I've only clocked 7k miles in the last 3 years (aaaaargh).
Not to digress, @Rob09msport,
My Z4 will be a bargain for someone, one day. It has sat most of its life with me apart. I've only clocked 7k miles in the last 3 years (aaaaargh).
Filippo
Hey Tony, it seems to me that you get more bang for your buck if you upgrade to forged pistons, sings, connecting rods and it's not really crucial to get a closed deck if you are aiming only for 700whp? Or am I wrong?
Honestly half the time has been my project work, but the other half has been 3rd party products that have failures, and trying to deal with that.I seriously thought I was the only one. I hit around 700 to 1k miles a year in a good year. the last 2 years probably 1300 miles total.
While that's true when looking at specific rods as examples, that's not correct when fundamentally looking at the design.The whole H beam vs I beam rod debates is biased. You have to take into account rod weight, material grade, RPM Range and cross section. Too many variable at play to say one is better than the other.
I am thinking the same thing. Forged pistons and upgraded rods seem to be crucial. Would be nice to avoid the inserts or the cost of sleeves if not going above 700. 700 and below seems to be a nice place for most of us for many reasons.
Here's the thing... close decks eliminate the open spaces tht the stock coolant flows through. So you in theory have more heat, more knock...the question is - is that a worth qhile trade off? Vs. Just jeeping open deck and upgrading piston, rings, rods and all bearings?
Here's the thing... close decks eliminate the open spaces tht the stock coolant flows through. So you in theory have more heat, more knock...the question is - is that a worth qhile trade off? Vs. Just jeeping open deck and upgrading piston, rings, rods and all bearings?
FWIW 4B11 blocks are open deck, yet can be made to handle >250whp per cyl when built right and sleeved. By comparison, the most powerful N54 out there is yet to crack 160whp/cyl...
I don't know too much about engines but I'd be worried about the cylinders ovaling over time and losing compression.
Also the head lifting off. So sleeves and head studs would be on my list.
So no need to sleeve or close deck if under 960 whp?
I would word the question differently. Or I just think this question makes zero sense.So no need to sleeve or close deck if under 960 whp?
That 960 values is based on 160 per cylinder as stated by the comment previous. Nothing to do with what I plan. Insurance for my power levels would be pistons, ring, rods, bearings without closed deck or sleeves. Because I only want 700 max and realistically 650... nowhere near 960 at all.I would word the question differently. Or I just think this question makes zero sense.
Back in the real world, failures often happen when everything doesn't work 110% right. It's a grey line. So design approach deals with the myriad of variances - material composition deviations, design deviations, assembly deviations, and the 1,000's of different real-world environment variances that make things not work like textbook fantasy land.
A built motor is just as much an exercise in insurance against everything that one can think of which can go off script (and all the stuff one can't think of) as it is trying to hit a magic number like 960whp.
Filippo