Hi all, I have been wanting to do a water to air street build for a while, I realize that this is not the best way to spend my money to make the most power per $. I am a mechanical engineer, and for whatever reason, this project interests me the most. I like the idea of having the output paths similar for both turbos and the other *potential* benefits that this system could provide. This is going to be a slow project, as my day job and marital obligations wind up leaving me with little free time. If you are a person or a vendor who wants to replicate the project, I may be able to provide some guidance, I have no intent to commercialize the design. If you do commercialize it and make a better design, all that I ask is that you give me a discount on the final product!
Potential benefits:
1)The reduced charge pipe volume will slightly improve throttle response
2)The reduced travel distance, number of bends, and length of travel through the A2A intercooler may provide some marginal high rpm performance gain for stock turbos due to the reduction in pumping losses.
3) Possible sub-ambient cooling at some point in the design
Potential drawbacks:
1) Weight
2) System Complexity
3) Cost
My first selection was the intercooler itself. I searched far and wide for Water to Air intercoolers, and I was never really satisfied with my options. Out of sheer frustration, I decided to try the most obvious choice (OEM M3). I liked that it had dual inlets with internal turning vanes to guide the airflow, had demonstrated good performance, and was made to work on a car that had a similar engine layout.
To my surprise, it was not a close fit, it was an exact fit! It neatly mounts directly to to the stock intake manifold with the same rubber shock-absorbing mounts that the airbox uses!
But there is no way that the hood will close with that thing in there right?
Wrong! Hood closes fine and with room to spare. Attached are some photos that I have taken showing the clearance remaining after shutting the hood. (this is for a LCI e90)
As you can see, the OEM expansion tank will also not require any modifications.
Potential benefits:
1)The reduced charge pipe volume will slightly improve throttle response
2)The reduced travel distance, number of bends, and length of travel through the A2A intercooler may provide some marginal high rpm performance gain for stock turbos due to the reduction in pumping losses.
3) Possible sub-ambient cooling at some point in the design
Potential drawbacks:
1) Weight
2) System Complexity
3) Cost
My first selection was the intercooler itself. I searched far and wide for Water to Air intercoolers, and I was never really satisfied with my options. Out of sheer frustration, I decided to try the most obvious choice (OEM M3). I liked that it had dual inlets with internal turning vanes to guide the airflow, had demonstrated good performance, and was made to work on a car that had a similar engine layout.
To my surprise, it was not a close fit, it was an exact fit! It neatly mounts directly to to the stock intake manifold with the same rubber shock-absorbing mounts that the airbox uses!
But there is no way that the hood will close with that thing in there right?
Wrong! Hood closes fine and with room to spare. Attached are some photos that I have taken showing the clearance remaining after shutting the hood. (this is for a LCI e90)
As you can see, the OEM expansion tank will also not require any modifications.